Dreitler and True have an excellent track record of trademark case success.


Dreitler and True have extensive experience in trademark, trade dress, unfair competition, copyright and domain name litigation in the federal courts and before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”). Dreitler and True successfully defended Joel Hyatt and Al Gore against efforts to enjoin the launch of their cable channel, Current TV. Current Communications Group LLC v. Current Media LLC,  76 USPQ2d 1686 (DC SD Ohio 2005), and obtained a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) and product recall order in U.S. District Court on behalf of Elizabeth Arden, ordering that a knock-off of "curious" Britney Spears perfume be recalled from store shelves. They represented Tiffany, Burberry, Kate Spade and Gucci in a civil action for counterfeiting in  U.S. District Court, Columbus, Ohio.

They represented Coors Brewing Company against a trademark and unfair competition lawsuit brought by the NCAA in Indianapolis, Indiana, and Clear Channel Communications in a trademark and unfair competition suit in the U.S. District Court, Los Angeles. They obtained a judgment on behalf of Dell Inc. against infamous cyberpirate John Zuccarini and permanent injunctions on behalf of Dell Inc. and Nationwide Insurance Company in trademark infringement cases in U.S. District Court, Columbus and Chicago.  Dreitler and True brought suit on behalf of Online Computer Library Center against the Library Hotel in U.S. District Court, Columbus, Ohio; and successfully defended Kmart and Joe Boxer in a trademark infringement suit; Target Corporation in a trade dress/copyright infringement case; and Quantum Corporation in a copyright infringement suit, all in U.S. District Court S.D. OH.

They have obtained favorable judgments in TTAB Oppositions on behalf of Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Cardinal Health, Wendy's International, Inc., The Ohio State University, the Scotts Company, Starter, Inc. and a recent Motion for Summary Judgment on behalf of George Speer. They are currently representing Cardinal Health, Harry Winston jewelers, Elizabeth Arden, Inc. and others in TTAB proceedings.

Dreitler and True have numerous favorable Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) proceedings on behalf of Dell Inc., Dell Computer Corporation (see below).

They obtained an Order in June 2000 from U.S. District Court S.D. OH. under the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA), ordering a cyber-squatter to turn over the domain name "StanleySteemer.cc".

In July 2000 they obtained a consent judgment and permanent injunction in U.S. District Court against a cyber-pirate of the domain "voryssaterseymourandpease.com".

In December 1999 Dreitler's team obtained a temporary restraining order (TRO) in U.S. District Court against a pornographic web-site that was using trademarks of The Ohio State University. The case ended with the entry of a permanent injunction against the web-site operators.

In September 1999, Dreitler filed suit in Federal court on behalf of Wendy's International, Inc. against a cyberpirate who had registered variations of Wendy's trademarks, including Wendys.org. The case was successfully decided for Wendy's when the cyberpirate agreed to turn over all the domain names to Wendy's, and accepted a permanent injunction banning him from ever again registering any variation of Wendy's trademarks as a domain name.

Dreitler represented The Ohio State University in a case in August 1999 against a photographer who had taken pictures of female Ohio State students for a "pin-up" calendar. The young women were wearing clothing or posed with items that suggested a connection or affiliation with Ohio State. Dreitler was successful in persuading a judge in U.S. District Court to grant an ex-parte Temporary Restraining Order (TRO), that barred the distribution of the calendars. The order was subsequently turned into a permanent injunction, banning distribution of the calendars and requiring them to be destroyed.

In July 1999, Joe and his team represented a small Atlanta businessman named Rothschild who had been sued in U.S. District Court in Dayton, Ohio by a larger Ohio company. The suit claimed that the mere fact the Atlanta business had an interactive web site was sufficient grounds to allow him to be sued in an Ohio Federal court. Dreitler argued that mere internet presence was not sufficient to provide "personal jurisdiction", and the chief judge of the Southern District of Ohio agreed. The case was transferred to Atlanta. Rothschild Berry Farm v. Serendipity Group LLC, 84 F. Supp. 2d 904 (S.D. Oh 1999).

Dreitler represented The Ohio State University in its case against Ohio University regarding the issue of whether the term "Ohio" was a trademark that could be owned exclusively by Ohio University. The universities settled the case on amicable terms in June 1999.

Before going into private law practice, he was Associate General Counsel at Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc., in St. Louis, Missouri. While at Anheuser-Busch, he conducted the world's longest running trademark litigation - the 90 year old dispute over ownership of the Budweiser trademark- between Anheuser-Busch and the Budweiser Budvar Brewery in the Czech Republic. In addition to managing litigation in more than 25 countries, he conducted settlement negotiations with the Czech government. He was also responsible for international intellectual property matters, including acquisitions, joint ventures, licensed brewing agreements in numerous countries, trademark development, clearance, registration and protection, including counterfeiting. He also drafted and negotiated trademark and copyright licenses, including sponsorship of the 1996 Atlanta Olympics and the Busch NASCAR racing series.

Prior to that, he worked at  The Procter & Gamble Company's Trademark and Copyright Department in Cincinnati, Ohio. During nine years at P&G, he worked on U.S. and international trademark, copyright and unfair competition matters in all product areas, including soap, paper, health care, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and food and beverages. His responsibilities included both U.S. and international trademark clearance and registration, false advertising and unfair competition, copyright, and licensing matters in all product areas. In addition, he was responsible for trademark and copyright aspects on all acquisition, mergers and divestitures of P&G. He performed due diligence and drafted the trademark and copyright agreements on acquisitions, mergers and divestitures.

He worked closely with Brand Management on global new product development, and all aspects of trademark searching, clearance and registration, including the writing of legal opinions and trademark application prosecution. He conducted oppositions and cancellations in the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office.

He began his career  as trademark, copyright, advertising and licensing attorney for U.S. Shoe Corp. in Cincinnati.


Meet Dreitler's Colleague


Mary R. True

 


Mary True has been practicing law for nearly 20 years and focuses her practice on helping clients obtain and protect  intellectual property rights to meet their business objectives.  A partner in the litigation group at Bricker & Eckler, LLP, True’s practice includes litigation in federal courts on matters relating to trademark and copyright infringement, right of publicity, unfair competition and false advertising, enforcement actions in the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, prosecuting applications in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and domain name protection before the World Intellectual Property Organization.

<>Mary has extensive experience in trademark, trade dress, unfair competition, copyright and domain name litigation in the federal courts and before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”).  With her colleague Joe Dreitler, she successfully defended Joel Hyatt and Al Gore against efforts to enjoin the launch of their cable channel under the trademark Current TV. Current Communications Group LLC v. Current Media LLC,  76 USPQ2d 1686 (DC SD Ohio 2005), and obtained a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) and product recall order in U.S. District Court, Columbus, on behalf of Elizabeth Arden, ordering that a knock-off of "curious" Britney Spears perfume be recalled from store shelves. They represented Tiffany, Burberry, Kate Spade and Gucci in a civil action for counterfeiting in U.S. District Court, Columbus, Ohio.  They represented Coors Brewing Company against a trademark and unfair competition lawsuit brought by the NCAA in Indianapolis, Indiana, and Clear Channel Communications in a trademark and unfair competition suit in the U.S. District Court, Los Angeles. They obtained a judgment on behalf of Dell Inc. against infamous cyberpirate John Zuccarini and permanent injunctions on behalf of Dell Inc. and Nationwide Insurance Company in trademark infringement cases in U.S. District Court, Columbus and Chicago.  Dreitler and True brought suit on behalf of Online Computer Library Center against the Library Hotel in U.S. District Court, Columbus, Ohio; and successfully defended Kmart and Joe Boxer in a trademark infringement suit; Target Corporation in a trade dress/copyright infringement case; and Quantum Corporation in a copyright infringement suit, all in U.S. District Court S.D. OH.   She also represented  Dell, Inc. in several successful UDRP actions before the World Intellectual Property Association, including Dell Computer Corporation v. High Traffic Domains Inc. (WIPO D2003-0282) and Dell Computer Corporation v. RaveClub Berlin (WIPO D2002–0601).<>

<>In addition, Mary has counseled Clear Channel Communications on disputes with Major League Baseball and the National Football League, and Ohio State University on trademark and right of publicity issues.  She is currently representing Nationwide Mutual Life Insurance Company, Cardinal Health, Harry Winston jewelers, Elizabeth Arden, Inc. and Celestial Pictures in TTAB proceedings, and Red Wing Shoe Company in an action for false advertising and false designation of origin in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio.

Mary is a member of the Board of Governors of the Intellectual Property Law Section of the Ohio State Bar Association and a member of the Saul Lefkowitz Moot Court Competition Committee of the International Trademark Association (INTA) 1993-96. She co-authored, with Joe Dreitler the article “Has the Sixth Circuit Abandoned Trademark Law”, which was published in the Spring 2005 Akron University Law Review, and an article titled "Pre-Filing Strategies and Evaluation" which appeared in the April 2004 IP Litigator magazine.  She is a frequent speaker on trademark and internet law, including CLE presentations to the Ohio State Bar Association and the Cincinnati Bar Association.

Contact Mary at (614) 227-4873 - mtrue@bricker.com





Cases we have handled




Allard Enterprises, Inc. v. Advanced Programming Resources,  146 F.3d 350 (6th Cir. 1998) (Joe was qualified as and testified as an expert witness on trademark law for Allard).

Baughman Tile Company, Inc. v. Plastic Tubing, Inc. and Plastic Tubing, Inc. of Florida
, CV-21-BO  (E.D. NC). Joe and Mary represented Baughman on its appeal.

Blacco Splicing and Rigging Loft, Inc. v. Wallingford's, Inc., C.V 2:04-275  (S.D. Ohio 2004). Successfully sued to stop use of trademarked color blue on competitive  product.

In The Matter of an application by Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc. v. Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik - The National Office of Industrial Property (NOIP) - Vietnam. Joe represented Anheuser-Busch, Inc. and argued its action to cancel the Czech brewer, Budweiser Budvar’s trademark registration of Budweiser in Vietnam before the NOIP, Hanoi.  Registration ultimately canceled.

Broadcast Music, Inc. v. The United States Shoe Corporation et al., 217 USPQ 224 (CA 9 1982). Joe represented defendant U.S. Shoe Corporation in connection with the first case interpreting Section 110(5) exemption of the 1976 Copyright Act with respect to “public performances”.

Crush International Inc. v. Red Bell, Inc.,  So Dist of Florida 89-0112 (1989). Joe sued on behalf of Orange Crush and obtained consent judgment and permanent injunction against Red Bell's use of Orange Krush for degreaser.

Grange Guardian Insurance Company v. The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America,  (S. D. Ohio 1999). Joe represented Grange Guardian in its Complaint for Declaratory Judgment for use of “Guardian” on insurance.  Case settled.

Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., et al. v. Nationwide Insurance Group, Inc. et al. C2-01-785 U.S.D.C. (S.D. Ohio 2001). Filed suit on behalf of client, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company for trademark infringement over use of Team Nationwide as a trademark for insurance and related services. Case settled.

Netset Internet Services, Inc. v. NetSetGo Inc., Case No. C2 01 0036, U.S.D.C. (S.D. Ohio 2001). Joe and Mary Defended NetSetGo in a trademark infringement suit in federal court regarding use of the trademark “NETSET” for internet services.  Case dismissed and NetSetGo, Inc. entitled to continue use of trademark.

The Ohio State University v. Does 1 through 500 inclusive, (Common Pleas Court of Franklin County, Ohio).  Joe obtained ex parte Seizure Order in Franklin County Common Pleas Court to permit Ohio State University to seize counterfeit products during football season.

The Ohio State University And Reading Recovery Council of North America v. Frank Martini, Case No.  C2-00-963, U.S.D.C. (S.D. Ohio 2000). Joe brought suit on behalf of clients Reading Recovery Inc. and The Ohio State University against Frank Martini for a web site that used reading recovery trademark and offered products and services that were compatible with client's services.  Case settled with Defendant changing name and agreeing not to use any similar domain name or trademarks.

The Procter & Gamble Company v. Revlon, Inc., U.S.D.C.  SD NY 89-5112. Joe sued Revlon on behalf of  P & G to enjoin use of "Ivory Coast" for hair shampoo. Case settled with Revlon agreeing to cease use of trademark.

Rubber-Seal Products A Division of Teknol, Inc. v. Norman John Wallage and Ormantine U.S.A. Ltd., Inc.; C-3-03-104, U.S.D.C. (S.D. Ohio) (2003). Joe obtained dismissal of trade dress case on behalf of client Wallage.

Too, Inc., Too Brands Investments, LLC, And Limco, Inc. v. American Marketing Enterprises, Inc., Kohl’s Department Stores, Inc. and Target Corporation, Civil Action No. C2 03 046, U.S.D.C. (S.D. Ohio 2001). Defended Kohl's and Target Corporation in a trade dress/copyright infringement case in U.S. District Court, Columbus. Case settled.

Selected Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) Cases

Big M. Inc. v. The United States Shoe Corporation, 228 USPQ 614 (TTAB 1985).  Joe represented defendant U.S. Shoe Corporation, Concurrent Use Proceeding No. 556, between Big M. Inc. and The United States Shoe Corporation.  Big M registrations refused.

Elekta Instrument AB v. Electa Health Network, LLC, Opposition No. 91124898 (TTAB 2002). Represented Elekta AB in trademark opposition which resulted in Applicant withdrawing their application and agreeing not to use the mark.

Georgia-Pacific Corporation and Fort James Operating Company v. Alwin Manufacturing Co., Inc., Opposition No.:  91125453 (TTAB 2002). Obtained judgment in a TTAB Opposition on behalf of Georgia-Pacific Corporation over alleged functional trade dress.

The Ohio State University v. Ohio University, 51 USPQ. 1289 (TTAB 1999). Represented The Ohio State University in its combined Opposition and Cancellation with Ohio University before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, and negotiated its settlement over shared rights to the trademark “Ohio”.

Pelikan Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG v. Capitol Broadcasting Company, Inc., Opposition No.:115,776  (TTAB 1999). Successfully represented Pelikan Pen Company against efforts by Capitol Broadcasting Company, Inc. to register “Pelican” in connection with minor league baseball services.

The Scotts Company and OMS Investments, Inc. v. Hayes Products, LLC, Opposition No.:  91114342 (TTAB 1999). Represented Scotts and opposed attempted registration of “PULL ‘N’ SPRAY” by Hayes as a registered trademark for a dispenser for fertilizers.  Case settled.

Underberg A.G. v. Bundaberg Distilling Company Pty Limited, Opposition No. 91112081 (TTAB 1998). Represented German beverage company Underberg in Opposition against registration of Bundaberg for beverages. Case settled.

Cardinal Health 301, Inc. v. Pyxis Genomics, Inc. f/k/a Anigenics, Inc., Opposition No. 91155874 (TTAB 2002). Brought Opposition on behalf of Cardinal Health 301, Inc. against application to register “Pyxis Genomics” by Pyxis Genomics, Inc.  Case settled.

Markdel, Inc. v. Wendy M. Craig, Opposition No. 123,740 (TTAB 1999). Obtained Judgment on behalf of Wendy’s International, Inc. restaurants against application by Wendy M. Craig to register “Wendy Made” for clothing.

Official Starter LLC. v. The Wisdom Company, Inc. Opposition No.:  120,244 (TTAB 2000). Represented  Starter clothing trademark against attempted registration of similar “S and star design” for clothing.  Case settled.

OMS Investments, Inc. and The Scotts Company v. Pursell Industries, Inc. Opposition No.:  116,788 (TTAB 2000). Successfully opposed Pursell Industries’ efforts to register “Better Lawns” for fertilizers on the grounds that the mark was merely descriptive on behalf of Scotts.

Nash-Finch Company v. Mettler-Toledo, Inc., Opposition No. 91150271 (TTAB 2001). Defended  Mettler-Toledo, Inc. in Opposition action against application to register “Express Check”.  Case settled.

The Procter & Gamble Company v. Lever Brothers Company, (TTAB 1986). Joe represented P&G and obtained judgment refusing registration of Secure for deodorant against client's Sure trademark.

The Procter & Gamble Company v. Block Drug Company, (TTAB 1985). Represented P&G and obtained refusala of registration of Perx for toothpaste against client's Pert trademark.

U.S. Playing Card Company v. King Card Spielkarten Und Accessoires GMBH, Opposition No. 113,211 (TTAB 1997). Joe represented  U.S. Playing Card  against application to register Blackjack Royale for playing cards. Judgment entered for client.

Harry Winston, Inc. and Harry Winston Ultimate Timepiece S.A. v. Bruce Winston Gem Corp. Opposition No. 91153147 (TTAB 2003). Represents Harry Winston, Inc. in opposition to registration of “Bruce Winston” for jewelry.


Selected Domain Name - UDRP Cases

BWT Brands, Inc. v. Domains By Proxy, Inc. (kool.com); WIPO Case No. D2005-0105 - domain ordered transferred to RJ Reynolds

Dell Computer Corporation v. Parmi Phull; WIPO Case No. D2001-0285 - domain ordered transferred

Dell Computer Corporation v. Logo Excellence; WIPO Case No. D2001-0361 - domain ordered transferred

Dell Computer Corporation v. Clinical Evaluations; WIPO Case No. D2001-0423 - domain ordered transferred

Dell Computer Corporation v. Michael Bartlett; WIPO Case No. D2001-1334 - domain ordered transferred

Dell Computer Corporation v. MTO C.A. and Diabetes Education Long Life; WIPO Case No. D2002-0363 - domain ordered transferred

Dell Computer Corporation v. 1st Easy Limited and Stephen Bell; WIPO Case No. D2002-0422 - domain ordered transferred

Dell Computer Corporation v. Clinical Evaluations; WIPO Case No. D2002-0423 - domain ordered transferred

Dell Computer Corporation v. RaveClub Berlin; WIPO Case No. D2002-0601 - domain ordered transferred

Dell Computer Corporation v. International Aggregate; WIPO Case No. D2002-1028 - domain ordered transferred

Dell Computer Corporation v. High Traffic Domains Inc., WIPO Case No. D2003-0282 - domain ordered transferred

Dell Inc. v. Asia Ventures, Inc.; WIPO Case No. D2003-0853 - domain ordered transferred

Dell Inc. v. delldomains.com; WIPO Case No. D2003-0854 - domain ordered transferred

Dell Inc. v. Asia Ventures, Inc.; WIPO Case No. D2004-0452 - domain ordered transferred

Dell Inc. v. None (Mohammad Qurash, dellcomputersclone.com); WIPO Case No. D2004-0511 - domain ordered transferred

Dell Inc. v. George Dell and Dell Net Solutions; WIPO Case No. D2004-0512 - domain ordered transferred

Dell Inc. v. Pateh Mbowe; WIPO Case No. D2004-0689 - domain ordered transferred

Dell Inc. v. Horoshiy, Inc; WIPO Case No. D2004-0721 - domain ordered transferred

Dell Inc. v. Intercardnetwork / Jonathan Jairo Aguirre Huertas; WIPO Case No. D2004-0788 - domain ordered transferred

Dell Inc. v. Expired Trafic (K Johar); WIPO Case No. D2004-0790 - domain ordered transferred

Dell Inc. v. Esprit7258; WIPO Case No. D2004-1026 - domain ordered transferred

FD Management, Inc. v. Teddie Kossof; WIPO Case No. D2004-0231 - Reddoor.com domain transferred to client Elizabeth Arden

GMB Inc. v. Caribbean Online International Ltd. WIPO Case No. D2007-1159 – Camelwides.com transferred to client R. J. Reynolds Tobacco company

KarstadtQuelle AG v. Tim Warren; WIPO Case No. D2003-0178 - domain ordered transferred

Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. DotaCom Corporation WIPO Case No. D2007-0157 – domain ordered transferred to client Nationwide Insurance

Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Domain Administration Limited WIPO Case No. D2006-1490 – domain ordered transferred

Nationwide Realty Investors, Ltd. v. Chip Regis WIPO Case No. D2006-1014 – domain arenadistrict.com domain ordered transferred to client

The Elizabeth Taylor Cosmetics Company v. NOLDC, Inc.  WIPO Case No. D2006-0800 – domain ordered transferred to client Elizabeth Taylor